Dear Reader

I am writing the same material all over again but in somewhat differing 
words, so that you can get the intended meaning I hope to convey to you.

It is time to change the paradigm on this planet - because we are in need of
it - change - towards a better, more peaceful and understanding world,
that of sense and sensibility.

It is of a very sensitive nature, that I write about - that is important
to fully understand and comprehend.
You, yourself are of an 'age' in which you can verify known facts and
information, and verify that which is only hinted and guessed at.
You know fact from fiction? Don't you?
You know of the human imagination, and how much it affects our lives -
to be able to dream/imagine the possibilities of a future, and hopefully
to move towards it - to what was imagined.

You know of human creativity and how important that is in our lives.
That expression of the 'arts' is important to those who exercise their
creativity, and also how it is received and perceived by those who
appreciate it.

I will come full circle to this particular point - that of the above
two paragraphs, above, in due course. Please realise how powerful
the human imagination is.


Back to the point about the paradigm shift - that is important to us,
all, so that we can shift towards a more cohesive and understanding world.
I personally see that the fault lies with religion and that area covered
by 'religion'. That we need to get all that sorted out, once and for all.
And it can be - using our reason and logic - ie. ordinary everyday common 
sense.

For a very long time, most of us (because I have felt this way too) have
been tolerant and 'understanding' of various cultures and religions - 
saying, Oh that has to do with culture and religion, and even if you don't 
agree with it, you do not have the right to deny it (that) existance.
And so you let things be - go with things as they are, because everyone 
'accepts' established beliefs and ideas, ie. let the status quo continue.

But if you value 'truth' at all - and have pursued the 'truth' - there 
comes a time with understanding of the 'truth' - that, that is not 
acceptable any more.
That time is NOW - in that there has been a change in consciousness on this
planet, there has been, it's been going on for some time now ---
in which established religion and ideas, are not enough --- they are 
inadequate (ie. not truthful) and some sense has to be made of all this 
(ie. of religous beliefs and that of 'ideas').
To know what is true? And what is fiction?

It is not enough to let things be - as they are. This is not good enough 
today. And certainly not good for tomorrow. You have only to be aware of 
what is in the 'news' to know this is true.
The 'news' has been terribly bad for a very long time - you have only to 
look at what's been in the good news department and what has been in the 
bad news department to compare what is what?

I ask of you to be fully aware and to stay in this mode, as we go through 
the rest of this text/message together.
That NOW is the time to be utterly and completely truthful and get to the 
bottom of what truth there is in this world? Keeping in mind - that wise 
saying - the more you know, the more you realise, what you don't know.
Or - the more you know, the more you realise, the more you have to learn.

At the heart of the world's problems today - is that of religion.
Specially relating to --- Judaism, Christianity and Islam.
These religions in particular are the troublesome ones, in which it is 
more easily provable that they are in error, and in fact, teach more 
disinformation, instead of information.
And at the heart of all this, is that simple question --- Does God exist?
I have to say sincerely, that there is more weight to the example being -
that God in fact, does not exist.
You have only to ask God - please come forth and show yourself...
We know the answer already --- that God does not come forth at all, only
'believers' who claim that God in fact does exist, and then they make all
manner of claims for an all powerful and ever present God - but nowhere do 
we see any evidence for any of the claims at all.
And in fact, God, and/or god and gods do not exist.

Let us examine the two most broad definitions of God, that most people cite,
as being what they believe in, and argue the case for and against.

1.
The God of the Bible, Torah, Koran, etc etc
This is the all powerful and all knowing God - and only in these documents,
does that God speak as such. This God judges and executes, make no mistake
about this. Slaughter of mankind by God is recorded. Yet is this the same
all loving and compassionate God of the Christians? etc
Well, believers may well say - but, oh - those people deserved it. As they
were wicked and depraved etc etc. Should innocent people be killed,
regardless? It is not just the wicked that gets killed, but the innocents
as well. When a whole population gets killed off, it also includes the old,
mothers and daughters, and children, etc etc. (Oh, and this God wants to be 
worshipped).
You can see the basic arguments outlined above - then you add the -
But we only have copies upon copies of these ancient documents, and we
have no way of ever verifying if they are accurate or not?
With Christianity, we have the further matter of the text being translated
across several languages? And we have to further add the matter of 
correctly understanding the exact meanings across the centuries - are we 
getting the exact meanings intended by the writers? Technology and knowledge 
has advanced greatly since those times, in which the documents were written.
How do we know, if it is at all accurate? eg. You have only to read 
the 'Book of Ezekiel' from the Bible, and ask yourself - what is being
described here? Most people would say - 
Oh, isn't that a UFO being described?

2.
God being not a single entity at all, like the above, but being the composite
of everything else. That 'God' becomes the universe.
The belief here, is that God is the universe, and everyone here, is part of 
that. God. This is along the lines, that God is love.
This has more appeal than the God mentioned above [ie. #1] ( which is an old 
archaic view about God ). This God is more invisible and part of everything 
else. It is an altogether different concept about God.

Of course, these two concepts of God, cannot coexist together.
One must be correct and the other, incorrect.
One is more truthful than the other?


It is very easy to argue the case for against #1 above.
That Judaism, Christianity and Islam have lied to us - there is no polite 
way of saying this, so why not? Be truthful and honest about all this.
They have used the myth of 'God' as a way and means of controlling the 
people - believers and unbelievers alike.
You have only to look at those people who are thoroughly convinced that the
Bible (or Torah or Koran) is wholely accurate and true, and being the
very word of God. Ask for proof that this is so, and there is lacking clear
evidence for any validity for these documents in question.

Christians may well say - But, the Dead Sea Scrolls do show how accurate
our current biblical text are.
The Dead Sea Scrolls are far from complete, in that we have very little of
the text surviving in complete form. Also it should be noted, that the
Essenes were not part of the majority, in question, of that time.
In fact they were in the minority. How would they compare today?
Would they be regarded as being too radical or simply conservative?

There are any number of ways to evalute whether God #1 exists or not?
You can simply look at the information given to us, about this God,
and then ask the question - Does any of this (information) make sense?
Is it consistant within itself, and does it relate to the real world,
that we all know?

Let us look at an extreme example, that is in the news, to try to see
what the situation is?

The case for the suicide bomber
I don't know their exact thoughts, etc - but one would guess it all
relies upon a promise that is given to them, that for what they do,
it will advance their cause and give them a reward in heaven.
But what we, the public see, is that this only encourages further
murder and bloodshed - that the suicide bomber is merely a pawn that
is used for an end. Those who set up the suicide bomber know full
well what they are doing - using religion to drive the willing
people to blow themselves up, along with the many others they target
to kill, ie. murder.
The religious clerics who say this is a just cause for suicide
bombers are themselves victim of a manipulation, they may not be
fully aware of?
In short these are empty promises given to the suicide bombers,
because there is no reason or logic, for their promise being
fulfilled and kept. It is all a manipulation.

Not all suicide bombers are religiously driven. In the case of
Russia, the situation there is very different.
As a member of the public, seeing the events there - I can only say, 
suicide is used because it is the only means that desparate people in a 
desparate situation can use, to draw attention to their plight, and
as their only means of revenge for what was done to them, mass
anniliation by the Russian authorities.
No one approves of what they have done, but it has drawn world wide
attention to the political situation in Russia.

Religion has have us led to believe that 'they' know all there is to
know about 'everything' - but the public finds that view misleading,
as all religions say something different, yet all say -
Listen to me only, I am the only one telling the truth, the others
are all liars. They may not boldly say that, but they imply that
anyway.
And the above conclusion is drawn anyway, when you look at the mess
that is religion.

There is a truth, a single truth, a one truth, and it is possible to
get from here (where we are now) to that singular truth, if you would
take a journey with me, with reason and logic by our side.
Open your mind and remain unbiased, until you have absorbed all the
relevant information which I will reveal to you.
The truth is simply - what happened? What did happen on this earth,
as far as our own human history goes. That of civilisation here.
How did it all begin - from the far reaches of time into that time,
in which 'Jesus' did live.

Science tells us that human life here on this earth, has been
here for so many millions of years. Now tell me of how much of
that time, do we know about? Which goes to show how limited our
knowledge of our own history is. Very, very little.

It is this simple line of logic and reasoning, that I will use,
to illustrate how we can get to the truth simply and logically.
By using such simple comparisons to illuminate the obvious.

I am not pointing out anything new at all. These simple facts have
been staring us in the face, all along. Nowadays, we can freely
dare to question what we have been taught all along - and we do
need to question what do we really know? In order to be sure of
whether we have any real information before us or not?
In past times, you could be brought before an inquisition for
daring to question the authority of the establishment, and then
be punished or killed for having your own thoughts and ideas.


Let us try to get to the real story - to the truth of the matter -
of what did happen?
Specifically in relation to this figure 'Jesus'. There is an
alternate story, if you will - which tells a story, that is
similar to the one well known, except there are a few things 
changed, or more than a few.
All of this is documented at the site www.tjresearch.info and
is covered in the books 'The Celestial Teachings' by James Deardorff
and 'King of Travellers - Jesus' Lost Years in India' by Edward T Martin.
Simply - the story is, that Jesus was not called 'Jesus' during his
lifetime but he was known as Jmmanuel. There is a surviving text
which tells the actual story of the events, known as the 'Talmud Jmmanuel'.
This text is written by Judas, who was Jesus/Jmmanuel's most trusted
apostle. The sensational story is, that Jesus did not die on the cross,
but was near death, was taken down and revived, by Joseph of
Arithmea and helpers - who were prepared for all this.
After recovering, Jesus journeyed with his mother Mary, onward to
India - however Mary being old and fragile, did not survive the journey.
She was buried en route, with Jesus eventually settling in Kashmir,
where he settled down, raised a family and died at a very old age.
He is buried there, sealed in a tomb, on top of which another spiritual
teacher is buried. There is the tomb of Mary, and the tomb of Jesus,
as physical evidence, also the record in various ancients in the area,
which tell of this story of events.
Judas the apostle did not betray Jesus, that was a different man entirely,
who was also named Judas. Judas was the treasurer for the apostles and it
would not make sense for him to betray Jesus for that small amount, as he
was handling more than that, for the group.
What Jesus actually taught, was not about 'God' at all, but about 
'the Creation'.
This is the creative force in the universe - the process by which creation
comes about.
He also taught about reincarnation and self responsibility.
Discussions about all this, can be found at www.figu.org. You need to 
register, and then you will be able to access via the excellent search 
engine on the site, all the discussions about the Talmud Jmmanuel text, 
and about Jesus.

How do you know any of this is true?

You have to do your own research and thinking.
Have you always accepted the traditional story about Jesus?
Were there aspects about that story, you felt were not quite right?
eg. That of Judas betraying Jesus. Surely Jesus would not have picked 
    someone unsuitable to become an apostle?
    Also Ed Martin, mentions that when Jesus mentioned to the group that 
    Judas would betray him, the apostles would not have sat down for their 
    last supper together afterwards, as if nothing did happen. 
    Rather, they would be highly agitated by it, and they would be prone to 
    fight it out.

Also did you always accept the resurrection story?
That it's rather too strange for the humble Jesus to suddenly become the 
Son of God? In this alternate story, Jesus remains a prophet.

And what does resurrection really mean? In the Christian view?
At one time, it was portrayed that the dead will rise from their grave --- 
but we know now, that will never happen.

Religion has always presented the view - that they know EVERYTHING.
Especially about life after death and the hereafter.
I like to point out that, they don't, and their view is seriously flawed.
They have always presented the case, that they know - and they simply don't.

What is the real truth about the universe?

How about the following, as fundamental truths, which engage our imagination
and awareness about us?


1.
There is no 'Death'. The human spirit lives on.
eg. 'The Day I Died' a woman recounts her near death experience after being
     operated on. See accompanying CDr which shows this television clip.
I use the real world as a storehouse of data and information, in which 
people have experiences, and when these experiences turn up time and time 
again,
there must be something to it? There are near death experiences, and
out of body experiences, in which people become detached from their physical
bodies and have an experience of absolute clarity, that they'll never forget
for the rest of their lives. Are these experiences real? I tend to think
they are, when they provide evidence (information) that supports their 
story.

2.
Reincarnation happens. Fact.
eg. A small boy has the memory of flying Corsairs during WWII.
    Their tires often burst. This and other information comes to light.
    Another clip.
Some people do retain a memory of their past life, as with children,
as in the above case. But also with adults too. When the information of
the memory is checked out, it appears to be accurate.


When you 'die' - you exit this life and go back from where you came from.
ie. The afterlife. The normal length of time between lives, can be 
approximately 150 years, the above case, though shows an exception.

This of course, appears to be different to what Christians believe in, yet
there are some christians who have no difficulty believing in reincarnation,
that Jesus taught reincarnation, and that there are references to 
reincarnation in the Bible, and there was much much more, but most 
references have been taken/edited out by the early Christian church, 
because reincarnation did not fit in with their views.

3.
The history of the earth and the human race is far stranger than
we can ever imagine it to be. We do not know our own history on this planet.
The actual history will sound like some 'Star Wars' saga or some such
fantasy/science fiction epic.
The scientific explanation of how life developed here - is far from
complete nor does it adequately explain our development here.

4.
There is no 'God'. God is a myth - fiction, and not fact.
The basis (ie. origin) of the myth of God or gods (Gods) is due to being
modelled on ETs. Erich von Daniken popularised the notion - 
'Was God an Astronaut?' but many others before him voiced the same question 
before him.
If there is no God? What is there?
There is 'the Creation' - the process by which life naturally develops in 
the universe. This was taught by 'Jesus'/Jmmanuel and by the Plejarens 
(ETs).
Discussion about this, is at www.figu.org
Register for the English discussion forum, and then use the search engine
to find previous discussions about this subject (and others) there.

5. 
UFOs (ie. ETs) are real. This is fact.
Though not all UFO sightings are genuine, ie. some are misinterpreted 
observations of natural or astronomical phenomena. Other sightings may be 
of 'terrestrial' UFOs, some of which are purposefully meant to fool the 
public into believing they are extra-terrestrial UFOs. UFOs (ETs) have 
always been present throughout our history.
eg. UFOs appear in the Bible. The Book of Ezekiel is all about a UFO 
    sighting.


Note: A lot of people may be turned off UFOs (just as some people are turned 
off about religion, and the question of God, etc) and/or ETs.
With the idea that 'they' have nothing to do with us. But UFOs and ETs are

as much part of us, as the idea(s) about God/etc.
Our own history will show that we are interconnected with ETs, and they with 
us. It is part of our heritage - a forgotten one.

Understanding these 5 truths - will give you a proper and comprehensive 
understanding of the universe in which we live, have lived and will live.
To acknowledge one and not the others is to limit your knowledge and 
understanding.
Similarly if you miss one out, you do not see the complete picture.
They do interlink with each other, also some connections are not obviously 
connected, whereas others may be intricately linked together.


How do you know if anything is true or not?

If it fits in with other pieces of information, and if it overall makes 
sense. Pieces of information fitting together logically and reasonably, 
tend to reinforce the picture that what you are looking at, is true.

Also do play the detective all the time.
See what motives are involved - and whether the information presented is 
clear of bias.
For example, at the time of the early Christian church - those were very 
chaotic times. You cannot simply say that at that time, men of high 
spiritual integrity formed the early christian church thereby bringing 
to us today, an accurate and truthful record that of God.
That is all a very romantic notion about the early Church, which is not 
accurate.




The Mass Illusion
If you are an onlooker looking at passionate Christians who believe in their 
faith, whether it is the evangelist preacher and that picture perfect hand 
picked audience that is shown on television, or speaking to some 
Jehovah's Witnesses about their faith, you can clearly see that they use 
their enthusiasm for their religion like a drug.
They have a very strong belief in their convictions, that what they believe 
in, is true.
They passionately believe in the version of Christianity to which they 
belong. They cannot doubt what believe in, because they are taught to 
believe in their faith, and any doubts would mean that they do not believe.
They are not open to looking at differing views about their faith/religion - 
because they have a very strong conviction of belief, in their particular 
belief system. They are fully committed to their church and religion.

It is all fine and good, if that is true - that their religion and belief 
system is true and correct.
But what if it isn't? Where would they be?
Participating in a mass illusion, that has been started long, long ago - 
backward to some centuries, which date to the belief that God exists, 
even though we can't see, hear or touch him. Some may well argue that you 
can't see electricity, as it comes into our homes, and we use it everyday, 
and still we can't see it. Or that we breathe air every day, and we can't 
see air, can we?
But we can see the effects of electricity and air. We cannot see, hear or 
touch the effects of God. The only difference between someone believing in 
God and someone who does not (whether ignorant or because he\she chooses 
not to) is merely their belief system. One simply believes and one doesn't.

How does that affect the person now, and in the hereafter?
Believing in God or not can have any number of effects, and can equally 
have not, as well. You can argue all the time about this.
And what happens in the hereafter, what difference does a person's belief 
have?
The Christian will believe he/she will go to heaven - for having believed 
in God, to be able to enjoy what fruits lie there.
That doesn't mean that a person who doesn't believe in God, doesn't end up 
in heaven as well? Again you can argue this all night, what happens in the 
hereafter?


We are able to verify one way or another whether something is truthful or 
not? We should be able to do that, and we can do it.

If you connect with your spiritual self, you can truthfully seek answers 
in this world, and feel the resonance within yourself, that it all fits 
in within your own understanding.
You cannot simply take someone's word that so and so is correct - 
especially in ideas and beliefs. You have to check it out yourself, in 
doing your own research and reasoning out.
I personally feel that people choose not to go to church, so as not to have 
to sit through a sermon, in which they can only listen, while a preacher 
goes on and on. You either become one of the believers, or you simply turn 
off and wish you were elsewhere.

Christianity is merely a romantic view that is not one of realism.
When people read the bible - do they truly understand it, at all?
Do they take part in some hollywood version of the Bible, in their 
imagination, and sincerely believe everything is accurate and true?
There may be millions of christians in the world today - but there are even
more millions unconvinced by 'Christianity' who cannot believe everything 
which Christianity stands for.

A romanticized view of Christianity, is someone believing what it is like in 
those times in which Jesus lived, and imagining themselves there, watching 
the events unfold, as recorded in the Bible.
They completely ignore the fact, of what was it like living in those times?
And where exactly did all that 'information' comes from?
Information being the details and doctrine of which they believe in -
it's not an accurate nor truthful account of the events, nor is it 
accurately intrepreted for people today. It is all romanticized beyond belief.